<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More about goals, vision and dreams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.melanieallen.co.uk/more-about-goals-vision-and-dreams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.melanieallen.co.uk/more-about-goals-vision-and-dreams/</link>
	<description>Life Coaching and Career Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:46:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=5228</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://www.melanieallen.co.uk/more-about-goals-vision-and-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melanieallen.co.uk/?p=534#comment-50</guid>
		<description>About goals. What I&#039;m talking about here is the long-term goal and vision rather than short-term goals, which do need to be concrete and vibrant. I think two things are at work: philosophy and temperament. 

&lt;strong&gt;Philosophy&lt;/strong&gt;. Behaviourist coaching models  - get the outside (behaviour) right and the inside (attitude/mindset) follows (NLP modelling is a very clear example of this) - need to make the vision as concrete , clear and compelling as possible. Achievement of that goal is what drives the action, so it must be. 

My Gestalt background points to a more &#039;inside out&#039; view - get the mindset and attitude right and behaviour will follow. Mindset, emotional connection to the goal and attitude are the drivers - and flexibility and adaptation to external and internal changes have to be built in to the goal-setting activity. If the vision is too rigid, it will collapse over time. 

&lt;strong&gt;Temperament.&lt;/strong&gt; Experience also shows me that for many people the more flexible approach to long-term goals is more effective. And it is for me, too, so my coaching style follows my own preferences. Despite that, I know that some of my clients need clear end-goals, and are excited and motivated by them. I&#039;d say that they are more action-oriented and  &#039;behaviourist &#039; by temperament, so I have to adapt my philosophy to accommodate them. It&#039;s like any coaching situation - it all depends on the individual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About goals. What I&#8217;m talking about here is the long-term goal and vision rather than short-term goals, which do need to be concrete and vibrant. I think two things are at work: philosophy and temperament. </p>
<p><strong>Philosophy</strong>. Behaviourist coaching models  &#8211; get the outside (behaviour) right and the inside (attitude/mindset) follows (NLP modelling is a very clear example of this) &#8211; need to make the vision as concrete , clear and compelling as possible. Achievement of that goal is what drives the action, so it must be. </p>
<p>My Gestalt background points to a more &#8216;inside out&#8217; view &#8211; get the mindset and attitude right and behaviour will follow. Mindset, emotional connection to the goal and attitude are the drivers &#8211; and flexibility and adaptation to external and internal changes have to be built in to the goal-setting activity. If the vision is too rigid, it will collapse over time. </p>
<p><strong>Temperament.</strong> Experience also shows me that for many people the more flexible approach to long-term goals is more effective. And it is for me, too, so my coaching style follows my own preferences. Despite that, I know that some of my clients need clear end-goals, and are excited and motivated by them. I&#8217;d say that they are more action-oriented and  &#8216;behaviourist &#8216; by temperament, so I have to adapt my philosophy to accommodate them. It&#8217;s like any coaching situation &#8211; it all depends on the individual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gill Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.melanieallen.co.uk/more-about-goals-vision-and-dreams/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Gill Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.melanieallen.co.uk/?p=534#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I found this interesting because I have found that there are two schools of thought on the vibrance of the dream/goal. Some say keep it fuzzy and general (Anthony Grant Phd) and others to be very specific and see it in colourful detail. (Lou Tice). I have found that being too specific can be very frustrating when you can’t achieve it exactly as you see it. (great discussion topic methinks). 
Gill Lucas, Life Coach</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this interesting because I have found that there are two schools of thought on the vibrance of the dream/goal. Some say keep it fuzzy and general (Anthony Grant Phd) and others to be very specific and see it in colourful detail. (Lou Tice). I have found that being too specific can be very frustrating when you can’t achieve it exactly as you see it. (great discussion topic methinks).<br />
Gill Lucas, Life Coach</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

